They Say I Say Sparknotes

Saturday, 6 July 2024

A challenge to they say is when the writer is writing about something that is not being discussed. In fact, the discussion had already begun long before any of them got there, so that no one present is qualified to retrace for you all the steps that had gone before. A gap in the research. In this chapter, Graff and Birkenstein discuss the importance of grasping what the author is trying to argue. They say i say sparknotes chapter 4. When the conversation is not clearly stated, it is up to you to figure out what is motivating the text. Multivocal Arguments. Careful you do not write a list summary or "closest cliche". What helped me understand this idea of viewing an argument from multiple perspectives a lot clearer, was the description about imagining the author not all isolated by himself in an office, but instead in a room with other people, throwing around ideas to each other to come up with the main argument of the text. Burke's "Unending Conversation" Metaphor. What I found helpful in this chapter were the templates that explain how to elaborate on an argument mentioned before in the class with my own argument, and how to successfully change the topic without making it seem like my point was made out of context.

They Say I Say Sparknotes Chapter 2

Someone answers; you answer him; another comes to your defense; another aligns himself against you, to either the embarrassment or gratification of your opponent, depending upon the quality of your ally's assistance. This enables the discussion to become more coherent. They Say / I Say (“What’s Motivating This Writer?” and “I Take Your Point”. Assume a voice of one of the stakeholders and write for a few minutes from this perspective. When this happens, we can write a summary of the ideas. When the "They Say" is unstated. The book treats summary and paraphrase similarly. Reading particularly challenging texts.

They Say I Say Sparknotes Introduction

In this chapter, Graff and Birkenstein talk about the importance of taking other people's points and connecting them to your own argument. Some writers assume that their readers are familiar with the views they are including. Chapter 2 explains how to write an extended summary. They say i say sparknotes chapter 2. Sometimes it is difficult to understand the conversation writers are responding to because the language and ideas are challenging or new to you. When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is about. Figure out what views the author is responding to and what the author's own argument is. Chapter 14 suggests that when you are reading for understanding, you should read for the conversation.

They Say I Say Sparknotes Chapter 1

The conversation can be quite large and complex and understanding it can be a challenge. This problem primarily arises when a student looks at the text from one perspective only. If we understand that good academic writing is responding to something or someone, we can read texts as a response to something. We will discuss this briefly. Who are the stakeholders in the Zinczenko article? They mention how many times in a classroom discussion, students do not mention any of the other students' arguments that were made before in the discussion, but instead bring up a totally new argument, which results in the discussion not to move forward anymore. What other arguments is he responding to? They mention at the beginning of this chapter how it is hard for a student to pinpoint the main argument the author is writing about. They say i say sparknotes chapter 1. However, the discussion is interminable. A great way to explore an issue is to assume the voice of different stakeholders within an issue. Write briefly from this perspective. The Art of Summarizing. The hour grows late, you must depart.

They Say I Say Sparknotes Chapter 4

Keep in mind that you will also be using quotes. Summarize the conversation as you see it or the concepts as you understand them. Is he disagreeing or agreeing with the issue? Deciphering the conversation.

What does assuming different voices help us with in regards to an issue? When you read a text, imagine that the author is responding to other authors. Writing things out is one way we can begin to understand complex ideas. And you do depart, with the discussion still vigorously in progress. What are current issues where this approach would help us? What's Motivating This Writer? They explain that the key to being active in a conversation is to take the other students' ideas and connecting them to one's own viewpoint. We will be working with this today moving into beginning our essays. Instead, Graff and Birkenstein explain that if a student wants to read the author's text critically, they must read the text from multiple perspectives, connecting the different arguments, so that they can reconstruct the main argument the author is making.