Neck Disability Index Scoring Pdf Sample

Saturday, 6 July 2024

The ICC is accepted as more appropriate than Pearson for quantifying reproducibility [22]. Deteriorated patients were excluded from the analysis (n = 2). Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. According to Deyo [16], assessing reproducibility by retest at one-to-two week intervals (rather than a shorter interval), may result in more realistic estimates of the variability to be observed among control subjects in a longitudinal study. "Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. "

Neck Disability Index Scoring Pdf Tool

2%) who did not answer to the 'reading'item had previously stated to be illiterate, thus providing for the lack of translation problems. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. Man Ther 14(4): 433-438. The original report provided scoring intervals for. Competing interests. This process refers to an in-depth interview of patients about their understanding of the questionnaire with the purpose of revealing inappropriate items and translation alternatives. Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Palmer JA: The reliability and construct validity of the Neck Disability Index and Patient Specific Functional Scale in patients with cervical radiculopathy. The items of the questionnaire are assessed on a 010 numeric rating scale in which 0 means no disability and 10 is maximum disability. Antonopoulou M, Ekdahl C, Sgantzos M, Antonakis N, Lionis C: Translation and standardisation into Greek of the standardised general Nordic questionnaire for the musculoskeletal symptoms. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pre-publication history. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G: Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. Pain research and treatmentPain-related fear: a critical review of the related measures. This questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life.

The validation procedure raised a large amount of missing data due to low applicability, which were assessed with two methods. I am able to engage in a few of my usual recreation activities because of pain in my neck. The ICC value calculated from these patients was 0. Spine, 2009 Jul 24, online article ahead of print. Chiu TTW, Lam TH, Hedley AJ: Subjective health measures used on Chinese patients with neck pain in Hong Kong. Musculoskeletal neck pain. Please note: This means 15-24 out of 50 (the RAW SCORE). Additionally, 6 patients (9. I can't do any work at all. Nevertheless the percentage of variance explained in this factor solution is rather low (<50%) which could be considered as a limitation of our study. Ackelman B, Lindgren U: Validity and reliability of a modified version of the Neck Disability Index. 8 was defined as the minimal acceptable level of reliability and we hypothesized that our findings would be consistent with a minimum coefficient of 0.

Neck Disability Index Scoring Pdf 1

Namely, after completing the questionnaire participants gave their general impression on the clarity of the items, the relevance of the content to their situation, the comprehensiveness of the instructions and their ability to complete it on their own. "Definition of the construct to be measured is a prerequisite for the assessment of validity. The procedure was initiated after contacting the developer of the instrument and informing him about the purpose of the study. Dochub is the greatest editor for changing your paperwork online. Regarding the analysis of responsiveness the Spearman correlation coefficient, as calculated for stable and improved patients, was 0. The study was approved by the Scientific Committee of the University Hospital of Heraklion (Protocol # 7213/1-8-2007). Grade II is a moderate neck strain where more muscle fibers are torn. 14, 409-415 Available from: (last accessed 1. Regression models were built to estimate the EQ-5D values from the NDI, neck pain, and arm pain scores. Based on the 15% criterion, the ability of the Gr-NDI to detect change over time was not constrained, thus making the interpretation of findings meaningful.

Carreon, L. Y., Anderson, P. A., et al. Medical outcomes Trust: Trust introduces new translation criteria. 6%) was not a translation issue since that finding is consistent with other studies [28]. We know that the minimum. Macdermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. DeVellis RF: Scale development: Theory and applications.

Neck Disability Index Scoring Pdf.Fr

Qual Life Res14:119–132, 200510. Recent studies have shown that there is a strong relationship between the SF-6D and the NDI such that using a simple linear regression allows for the estimation of an SF-6D value from the NDI alone. 93) is comparable with the results of the Dutch study (ICC: 0. All eligible subjects agreed to participate in the study and returned to complete the questionnaires for a second time (100% response rate). Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL: Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation.

Minimal Detectable Change. Scoring: For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0, if the last statement is marked it = 5. Scoring: Each question contains six answer choices, scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). McDonoughCM, TostesonTD, TostesonAN, JetteAM, GroveMR, WeinsteinJN: A longitudinal comparison of 5 preference-weighted health state classification systems in persons with intervertebral disk herniation. Dimensionality was examined by internal consistency analysis (Cronbach's alpha) and factor analysis. 90) since they used similar methods to ours.

Neck Disability Index Scoring Pdf Fillable

He was also consulted during the validation process and revised the final draft of the manuscript. Health Qual Life …Measurement properties of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory by cross-sectional and longitudinal designs. Childs, J. D., Cleland, J. McHorney CA, Ware JA: Construction and validation of an alternate Form General Mental Health Scale for the medical outcomes study Short-Form 36-item Health Survey.

Van der Velde, G., Beaton, D., et al.